Check every requirement
Each submission is checked against every requirement in the guideline set, not a sampled subset. Deterministic rules catch the cases rules do well.
← All systemsCompliance
Application Review
A rule plus LLM hybrid that validates each submission against a long requirement guideline set and surfaces exactly which requirements pass, fail, or need a human look.
LLMRule engineDocument parsingValidation
Pass/failMarked per requirement
Flagged onlyRouted to people
At scaleFrom a team bottleneck
The problem
Each submission had to be checked against a long set of requirement guidelines for compliance and completeness, one document at a time.
Done by hand the review was slow, inconsistent between reviewers, and a bottleneck for the whole team.
How it works
Extract, verify, then route the unsure to a human.
route_to_human.pipeline Confident · auto Unsure · to a human
Incomingcases · docs
Modelconfidence
Human review
Flagged cases
Auto-resolved
Confident, cited
Apply judgment
The LLM handles the requirements that need reading and judgment, the ones a rule cannot express cleanly.
Route the unsure
Each requirement is marked pass, fail, or needs-a-human. Reviewers spend their time only on fails and uncertain cases.
What shipped
Compliance and completeness checks that used to bottleneck a team now run at scale, applied the same way every time.
Humans review only the flagged cases instead of reading every submission end to end.
Book a call →